SHREWSBURY FILM
| Director | Ousmane Sembène |
|---|---|
| Country | Senegal |
| Year | 1977 |
In 1977, Ousmane Sembène—often hailed as the father of African cinema—released Ceddo, a searing, allegorical drama set in a precolonial West African village. It premiered at the Cannes Directors’ Fortnight and later screened at the Moscow International Film Festival. The title refers to the Ceddo, a term used for “outsiders” or “resisters”—those who refused conversion to Islam or Christianity and sought to preserve their animist traditions.
The film met with official resistance in Senegal, where it was banned until 1984. The stated reason—a spelling dispute over “Ceddo” containing two ‘d’s—was widely regarded as a pretext to suppress Sembène’s forthright critique of political and religious authority. This was not unusual for Sembène, whose work persistently confronted colonialism, class, religion, and gender oppression.
As part of African “Third Cinema,” Ceddo rejects Western narrative norms in favour of didactic, community-based storytelling. Its 4K restoration by The Criterion Collection, as part of Three Revolutionary Films by Ousmane Sembène, reintroduces the film to new audiences and affirms its place as a landmark of world cinema.
The film unfolds in a Senegalese village where King Demba War increasingly aligns himself with Muslim forces, sidelining traditional animist practices. The Ceddo resist this religious takeover by kidnapping Princess Dior Yacine, the king’s daughter. Negotiations fail, and tensions escalate.
The imam, a figure of quiet but absolute authority, orchestrates the killing of the king and the expulsion of Christian slave traders, consolidating Muslim dominance. Forced conversions follow, undermining the Ceddo’s cultural autonomy.
Tabara Ndiaye’s portrayal of Dior Yacine is striking for its restraint. For most of the film she is silent, positioned as a bargaining chip in a male-dominated power struggle. Yet her stillness becomes a form of resistance—an embodiment of withheld agency that erupts only at the film’s end.
Sembène often draws his characters as ideological archetypes rather than psychologically rounded individuals. The imam is a steely embodiment of religious authoritarianism; the Ceddo warriors, guardians of a fading tradition; the Christian traders, emissaries of an equally disruptive foreign creed. This deliberate stylisation serves the film’s political purpose, framing its conflict as a broader historical drama rather than a personal melodrama.
Ceddo is, at its heart, a story about resistance—not simply against European colonialism, but against any form of cultural erasure. Sembène critiques the idea that Islam or Christianity represent benign progress, portraying them instead as systems of power that replace one form of domination with another.
The tension is not framed as a binary clash between “modern” and “traditional” but as a layered struggle: political authority, religious legitimacy, and economic exploitation intertwine. The Ceddo are not romanticised—they too are shown as capable of violence—but their cause resonates as a defence of autonomy.
The film’s feminist undercurrent is notable. Dior Yacine’s final act transforms her from a pawn to the decisive agent of resistance. Sembène has described her as “the incarnation of modern Africa”—a vision of a continent where women are central to the fight for cultural survival.
Stylistically, Ceddo is austere but ceremonial. Much of the action unfolds in public spaces—courtyards, markets, and open fields—mirroring the oral tradition of griots, where communal debate takes centre stage. Dialogue often takes the form of formal speeches rather than conversational exchange, lending the film an air of political theatre.
Sembène employs long takes, frontal compositions, and minimal camera movement, giving each scene a deliberate pace. The stillness forces the viewer to contemplate the symbolic weight of each action and word. Two fantasy sequences punctuate the realism: one depicts the priest’s vision of a thriving church, undercutting missionary triumphalism with irony; the other offers a dreamlike image of a society resisting foreign domination.
The cumulative effect is of a film that is both historical pageant and political tract—eschewing suspense in favour of moral clarity.
Though set centuries ago, Ceddo resonates strongly in the present. Its depiction of ideological encroachment speaks to contemporary struggles over cultural identity, religious pluralism, and political autonomy. The film also engages with pan-African concerns: the erosion of indigenous practices in favour of imported systems, and the ease with which these systems can be used to consolidate authoritarian rule.
The Criterion restoration has reintroduced the film to global audiences, inviting reappraisal not only of its craft but of its relevance to modern debates about decolonisation, cultural sovereignty, and the role of women in revolutionary movements.
While not universally embraced on release—some Western critics found its pace and stylisation alienating—Ceddo has since been recognised as one of Sembène’s most important works.
Fernando F. Croce praises it as “a magnificent film… a comparable act of resistance… beautifully staged”. Viewers have highlighted the ending as one of cinema’s most quietly electrifying reversals.
For modern audiences—particularly those used to rapid cutting and psychological realism—the film may demand patience. But in doing so, it offers something rare: a cinematic space in which history is debated, not simply dramatized.
Ceddo remains a bold, uncompromising work—a film that confronts viewers with the political dimensions of faith, the fragility of cultural traditions, and the latent power of those written out of official histories. Its freeze-frame ending is more than a stylistic flourish; it is a manifesto in a single image, daring us to imagine an Africa that defines itself.
In an effort to reduce our paper usage, we stopped offering printed copies of our popular Film Notes at our screenings.
Instead, we are encouraging our members to read the Film Notes online. For those who wish to do so, it is still possible to print these pages prior to the film.
Alternatively, if you want to read the notes just before or just after the film, and also minimise your paper consumption, then you can scan the QR code to your phone and then download the webpage.
